PUBLICATIONS: Timothy P. O'Neill
Law Review Articles
CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT AS JEREMIAD, 45 VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW ___ (2010) (FORTHCOMING)
MIRROR NEURONS, THE NEW NEUROSCIENCE, AND THE LAW: SOME PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS, 39 SOUTHWESTERN LAW REVIEW __ (2010)(FORTHCOMING)
ILLINOIS COURTS AND THE LAW OF MIRANDA WAIVERS: A POLICY WORTH PRESERVING, 30 NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 429 (2010)
VAGRANTS IN VOLVOS: ENDING PRETEXTUAL TRAFFIC STOPS AND CONSENT SEARCHES OF VEHICLES IN ILLINOIS, 40 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO LAW JOURNAL 745 (2009)
THERE WILL BE BLAME: MISFORTUNE AND INJUSTICE IN THE SWEET HEREAFTER, 5 UNIVERSITY OF DENVER SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 19 (FALL 2008)
THE CLEAR INITIATIVE AND MENTAL STATES: 1 ½ PROBLEMS SOLVED, 41 JOHN MARSHALL LAW REVIEW 701 (2008)
SCALIA'S POKER: PUZZLES AND MYSTERIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 24 CONSTITUTIONAL COMMENTARY 663 (2007)
"THE STEPFORD JUSTICES": THE NEED FOR EXPERIENTIAL DIVERSITY ON THE ROBERTS COURT, 60 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW 701 (2007)
"STOP ME BEFORE I GET REVERSED AGAIN": THE FAILURE OF ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURTS TO PROTECT THEIR CRIMINAL DECISIONS FROM UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT REVIEW, 36 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO LAW JOURNAL 893 (2005)
RETHINKING MIRANDA: CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION AS A FOURTH AMENDMENT SEARCH AND SEIZURE, 37 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 1109 (2004)
TWO CONCEPTS OF LIBERTY VALANCE: JOHN FORD, ISAIAH BERLIN, AND TRAGIC CHOICE ON THE FRONTIER, 37 CREIGHTON L. REV. 471 (2004)
WHY MIRANDA DOES NOT PREVENT CONFESSIONS: SOME LESSONS FROM ALBERT CAMUS, ARTHUR MILLER, AND OPRAH WINFREY, 51 SYRACUSE L. REV. 863 (2001)
BEYOND PRIVACY, BEYOND PROBABLE CAUSE, BEYOND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: NEW STRATEGIES FOR FIGHTING PRETEXT ARRESTS, 69 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO L.REV. 693 (1998)
THE ROLE OF RACE-BASED JURY NULLIFICATION IN AMERICAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE (FOREWORD TO SYMPOSIUM), 30 JOHN MARSHALL L. REV. 907 (1997)
INSTRUCTING ILLINOIS JURIES ON THE DEFINITION OF “REASONABLE DOUBT”: THE NEED FOR REFORM, 27 LOYOLA U. CHICAGO L.J. 921 (1996)
STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN ILLINOIS CRIMINAL CASES: THE NEED FOR MAJOR REFORM, 17 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS U. L.J. 51 (1992)
VINDICATING THE DEFENDANT’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO TESTIFY AT A CRIMINAL TRIAL: THE NEED FOR AN ON-THE-RECORD WAIVER, 51 U. OF PITTSBURGH L. REV. 809 (1990) (PDF)
WAIVER OF CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN CRIMINAL CASES: CONFUSION IN THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT, 11 NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIV. L. REV. 55 (1990) (PDF)
ILLINOIS’ LATEST VERSION OF THE DEFENSE OF VOLUNTARY INTOXICATION: IS IT WISE? IS IT CONSTITUTIONAL?, 39 DE PAUL L. REV. 15 (1989) (PDF)
ANALYSIS OF ILLINOIS’ NEW OFFENSE OF SECOND DEGREE MURDER, 20 JOHN MARSHALL L. REV. 209 (1986) (PDF)
THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE BURGER COURT: VICTIMS’ RIGHTS AND A NEW MODEL OF CRIMINAL REVIEW, 75 JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY 363 (1984) (PDF)
“WITH MALICE TOWARD NONE”: A SOLUTION TO AN ILLINOIS HOMICIDE QUANDARY, 32 DE PAUL L. REV. 107 (1982) (PDF)
|
