|
Evidence Blog | SSRN Page | Publications | Presentations
In law school, Colin Miller was an editor of the William and Mary Law Review and senior articles editor of the William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal. In addition, he taught classes on the use of courtroom technology for mock trials, and was a teacher/mentor instructing students in legal research, writing, and substantive law in preparation for mock trials.
Professor Miller came to John Marshall after serving as an appellate court attorney, reviewing cases and preparing reports for members of the New York Supreme Court-Appellate Division. He has written numerous law review articles on various legal topics. His specialty areas are civil and criminal procedure and evidence.
Professor Miller joined the faculty in 2007. He teaches Evidence and Civil Procedure I.
Full Curriculum Vitae
Publications
Impeachable Offenses?: Why Civil Parties in Quasi-Criminal Cases Should be Treated Like Criminal Defendants Under the Felony Conviction Impeachment Trial, ___ Pepp. L. Rev. ___ (2009 forthcoming), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1260390.
A Public Privilege, ___ Yale L.J. Pocket Part ___ (2009 forthcoming), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310282.
Ordeal by Innocence: Why There Should Be a Wrongful Incarceration/Execution Exception to Attorney-Client Confidentiality, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 391 (2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1135624.
Even Better than the Real Thing: How Courts Have Been Anything But Liberal in Finding Genuine Questions Raised as to the Authenticity of Originals Under Rule 1003, 68 Md. L. Rev. 160 (2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1101509.
"Manifest" Destiny?: How Some Courts Have Fallaciously Come To Require A Greater Showing Of Congressional Intent For Jurisdictional Exhaustion Than They Require For Preemption, 2008 BYU L. REV. 169 (2008), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1118394.
The Best Offense is a Good Defense: Why Defendants' Nolo Contendere Pleas Should Be Inadmissible Against Them When They Become Civil Plaintiffs, 75 U. CIN. L. REV. 725 (2006), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006227
"Caveat Prosecutor": Where Courts Went Wrong in Applying Robertson's Two-Tiered Analysis to "Plea Bargaining" and How to Correct Their Mistakes, 32 NEW ENG. J. ON CRIM. & CIV. CONFINEMENT 209 (2006).
A Shock to the System: Analyzing The Conflict Among Courts Over Whether and When Excited Utterances May Follow Subsequent Startling Occurrences In Rape And Sexual Assault Cases, 12 WM. & MARY J. WOMEN & L. 49 (2005).
Banishment From Within and Without: Analyzing Indigenous Sentencing Under International Human Rights Standards, 80 N.D. L. REV. 253 (2004).
A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Wolf v. Ashcroft and the Constitutionality of Using the MPAA Ratings to Censor Films in Prison, 6 VAND. J. ENT. L. & PRAC. 265 (2004).
Inadmissible but Material? Resolving the Circuit Split After Wood, International Commentary on Evidence (2004), at http://www.bepress.com/ice/vol1/iss2/art1/
A Death By Any Other Name: The Federal Government's Inconsistent Treatment of Drugs Used in Lethal Injections and Physician-Assisted Suicide, 17 J.L. & HEALTH 217 (2002-03).
Escape from New York: Analyzing the State's Relative Interests in Proscribing the Withdrawal of Life Support and Physician Assisted Suicide, 11 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 779 (2003).
Presentations
Life and Death Decisions, presented at the Benjamin Rush Symposium, Spring 2002.
|
